|
MCA Overview

HIGHLIGHTS
Total Area
• 31,080 km² • 12,000 mi²
Habitat Types
• swamps • forests • talus slopes • pastures • vernal pools • grasslands • calcareous fens • bogs
Some Resident Wildlife
• Canada warbler • sharp-shinned hawk • bobcat • black bear • bog turtle • timber rattlesnake • Jefferson salamander • wood frog • river otter • five-lined skink
Partners
• Local and state governments • Builders and developers • Land trusts • Conservation organizations • Scientists
Contacts Michael W. Klemens, Ph.D. mca@wcs.org
Support this Project! Contributions can be sent to: WCS Metropolitan Conservation Alliance 25 Prospect Street, Suite 205 Ridgefield, CT 06877
Click here to donate online
|
The Wildlife Conservation Society's Metropolitan Conservation Alliance bridges the gulf between science and practice by developing innovative, locally-based strategies that tackle ecosystem loss and urban sprawl at the suburban/rural frontier.
The Human Aspect Urban centers around the world are often located in biologically rich regions because civilizations thrive where there is an abundance of natural resources such as water, fertile soils, sheltered harbors, and food. Conservation efforts are especially challenging in these densely populated, biologically rich areas. There is much that is worth protecting; at the same time many land uses compete for resources. In such settings, conservation can only be achieved by working together—collaborating across political boundaries and establishing common goals among the many interest groups.
Threats An expanding wave of suburban sprawl, fostered by a lack of informed land-use decisions, threatens the rich biological heritage of many metropolitan regions. Lack of communication between conservation scientists and land-use decision-makers has resulted in the destruction of wildlife habitats and the fragmentation of remaining habitat area into small, isolated, and often degraded patches unable to support a diversity of wildlife.
.jpg)
WCS Activities
Addressing sprawl requires a multi-faceted approach, one that synthesizes the strategies employed by the WCS North America Program. In the Metropolitan Conservation Alliance (MCA) “Biotic Corridor” approach, wildlife surveys are conducted in clusters of towns to determine where critical resources occur at a multi-town, landscape scale. Survey results become the baseline layer in the planning process and help to inform policy. Rather than using biological information to oppose development, it is used to guide development into more ecologically sensitive and sustainable directions. In this way, WCS’s MCA Program seeks a balance between environmental and economic health.
MCA develops innovative conservation tools that respond to the needs of communities and decision-makers as they strive to integrate biodiversity information into the land-use planning process. Published in the WCS/MCA Technical Paper Series, these tools are developed in collaboration with land-use attorneys, biologists, developers, municipal officials, agency personnel, and university researchers. Collaboration is necessary to maximize the dissemination of these tools, so we also develop partnerships with local land trusts, watershed organizations, conservation districts, and others.
Building bridges between science and practice requires more than just a transfer of information. It requires education, capacity-building, provision of technical support, collaboration with partner organizations, and a long-term rapport with land-use practitioners. The key ingredient of conservation is collaboration. By bridging gaps, strengthening communications, and integrating the needs of all parties, we can ensure that wildlife and habitats in developing areas remain healthy, now and into the future.
|